Ken Bolton
Five poems
You can read Peter Minter’s interview with Ken Bolton in this issue of Jacket. And on the Australian Literature Resources site, you can read a bibliography, a selection of poems, and Ken Bolton and John Jenkins: Seven collaborative poems.
(Pinkham)
for Gregory O’Brien
I wonder how
Gregory does this
these three line
stanzas & whether I
can do them —
to any good effect.
I make coffee, check
various things around
the kitchen — find
the new clock
I got Gabe for his
birthday, note the
milk is almost
gone, bring the tea back
& sit at this finely red-&-
white checked table cloth
again, pick some rice off it
from the meal tonight
chew it, & start — which means,
mostly, I stop here
& see how I’ve done
It has my characteristic choppy
rhythms, etcetera. Oh well.
It is called after
Albert Pinkham Ryder
— Gregory’s poem —
“called after” an American
phrase, that I guess
comes to mind
as I recall
what little I know
of the American artist —
19th century? or
very early 20th?
I visualize small
emblematic paintings
typically
with a dark image
centered — briefly
silhouetted —
against a dark background —
a sort of horse-&-rider
against a storm? (The image
my mind remembers
may even be
some late sketch by Moreau
— you know: the late,
atypical unfinished
heavily impasto
fragments that
art historians love to suggest
the Fauves might have seen —
miles from the
stillness, & detail,
of Oedipus & the Sphinx
say — or “in most ways”
Anyway this is miles
from Ryder. And I am
briefly sure
it is Ryder I can imagine
& the Moreau too — his
horse & rider
in reds & blues
lemon yellow, the American’s
black & deeply
varnished colours — browns —
against a discoloured
white, or cream
& a larger dark ground.
Tho who knows?
Ryder
is not really our business
a reverberation of US
culture: local news
like CNN, the
American breakfast program
we get at night. What a
hopeless analogy. Ryder is better.
Moreau —
well, I like to bear in mind
his presence
along with Manet &
that revolution. Tho
give me Manet
any day, if I had
to choose. Tho, um, you don’t.
I like the portrait
— full face, almost filling
the frame — of Moreau
in a bowler hat
high collar, & tie, narrow
moustache — very
1900s modern
by Roualt (pupil
& friend) that is
slightly ‘cubist’:
the one eye furthest from us
— it is three-quarter on — & that
whole plane, of cheek
& wide wide forehead,
swells out, flattens,
just slightly.
It seems an irony
of history —
or perhaps the irony
was Roualt’s. It was
mine too eventually
(though less originally)
when I did a copy
of it . . .
that I liked
& seem to have lost now
Misplaced. I haven’t seen it
for a while
(I could do it
again.) I take the rest
of the tea
& toss it on the
pot-plant, beneath the goldfish.
The plant had dried out.
The fish wake slightly
& begin to move —
at this angle
a few vague red shapes,
a diaphanous white,
in a tank that looks
dark
Good Friday at the EAF
weekends here
are the best: beautiful, quiet
I sit in Caron’s & my chair
the one we share, at the desk
between our desks, the shutters
letting in light
all is white, the shadows
diffuse — multisourced —
light coming from many directions
I’m beginning to die myself I see
because mostly I sense I cannot see
too well — & have almost a headache. Julie
types way across the space on the computer
the rustle of language that quiet rattle,
Michael came in, adjusted some
of the new equipment, & left — dressed for
tennis. Julie is dressed
differently too —
tight pants. Only I am dressed
the same —
but I am dying. And it is
Good Friday. Big deal, it will
take a while
I make tea, get paper,
start this
Hindley Street Today, with a view of Michael Grimm
What to do
when the day’s heavy heart,
settled,
rises then —
thru some quality of the light —
& you your own mug
raise up
to see it,
register it
bing!
the way counter staff would
gain change
in the old days,
but not any more —
& not ‘today’, today
being now
(& in this ‘day & age’) —
Those old-time cash registers
having gone
before the electric typewriter, even, disappeared
— tho
I never
had one
of those.
Why,
pause, & reflect, & look down the street
where Michael Grimm might come
— & with any luck holding
in his hand
the tape you requested
& he was pleased to deliver
notionally.
Tho ‘notionally’
Notionally might well mean “Never”
Have you got it? Well
give it here!
Maybe he does.
On it several versions of Bauhaus:
“Bela
Lugosi’s
Dead”.
It’s too bright & clear
in Hindley Street —
for him to be about,
the Count.
Yet, the waitress says —
“Yeah, I frighten a lot of people,”
says jokingly
tho without much effort
as she clears the table
where I sit today
outside
to a patron whom she’d startled
— & actually, tho she’s
pretty enough
her makeup’s vaguely ‘Goth’.
I find her interesting
— as I look up today
& down the street
looking for it to confirm my intimation
& expanded heart
With a view of, say, seraphic Michael Grimm
& my tape
on which
Bela Lugosi’s dead
studio version & ‘live’.
He’s dead
& Dion
& so is Bing.
Bob Hope lives on, I think,
tho barely
but I’m alive
& Michael & Julie & Chris —
& those dead-heads from
the Arts Department
they’ve moved in
& now they find us ‘more alive’ —
we
laugh
at that,
‘good naturedly’,
the street is cleaner, too
since
they arrived
a reason why
the light strikes things better now
&, if this coffee haint improved
my mood has
as I think, Yep
— of Michael,
The Grimster —
will he have done it yet?
Too soon.
“Too Soon”
— the Nirvana story
it usually is
too soon, I guess
even Lugosi might have thought
One more day, a week!
I think, “not yet”
I’ve got
the ‘Hindley Street’ template out & operating again, the
details falling in
— ‘signed up’ for the long ride,
Tho less some days than others
but
just this minute I’m up for it.
The street looks grey & white
& muted
benign — or tired — or
more forgiving
Is that just the lack of traffic?
Temporary. And the lull between the late
breakfasters
& the early-lunch crowd, the time
given
the waitress to talk
the old men
at their tables, plotting
— plotting nothing —
the Tech teachers at elevenses, me,
& fucking
Michael Grimm
nut
Poem (“the ice in my glass”)
the ice in my glass goes crink!
as it adjusts to the tequila — keying in
that sophistication — the feel of it — I associate
with these tall buildings — a bit of the
skyline of New York I envisage,
important to me for many years —
or if they weren’t, the buildings stood
for the idea of importance, New York —
an imaginary number filling out
an order — of which the others were a part:
the finite Melbourne, Sydney, Glebe —
& Fitzroy & Bega. Did I think about it?
But it became less important — & then, almost by accident,
I visited, & saw it — specific, real —
& loveable, surely — if less impressive than the
rarely summoned abstraction. Strange —
& terrible — to think of it threatened,
New Yorkers frightened — as the city’s image
draws retaliation upon it. Clink, the ice again, settling.
My New York — the notional one — the city of poets,
of art. I met one poet there — ‘perfect’ —
urbane, bohemian a little, worldly, smart,
immensely intelligent. (The art, there, was in galleries
& historical — great, but not like the poet.) My
second time I met rich people — the sort the terrorists
think of: people congratulating themselves on
the world & their ownership of it — talking deals, leverage,
new fields, salaries & investment. We were on a penthouse roof
near the UN building, looking out over the water
(towards New Jersey? — somewhere) for
the fireworks of July the 4th. The same UN building
as in James Schuyler’s poem, that moves slightly — in
the wind, the light — or has that building been torn down & gone
& this is a new one?
The New York I like —
personalized, romantic — about which I know a great deal,
detail — things that have happened there, what one poet said
to another (at Gem Spa, at the Morgan Library), the
books they read, thoughts they had: unreal again —
a fabled, picturesque locality, of thirty years ago.
A little like the Sydney I now visit, which I left
in the 80s & in fact hardly know — can scarce reconcile
with the site of my former life there: where X said A to Y,
where ‘L’ lay (or sat) & wrote ‘Sleeping in the Dining Room’,
or ‘A’ began, “Saussure! Saussure!” — where I lived, round the corner
behind the Max Factor Building. I didn’t meet the rich —
tho Sydney has them — resembling New York’s probably
& voting just as vociferously
to support war on the Afghans.
Frank O’Hara, a hero of mine — a one-time hero, a hero still —
mixed with the rich a little. But as was said in his defence once
recently, he never owned more than two suits. He was not of them.
I don’t like the Sydney rich — for wishing to be interchangeable
with their New York counterparts. Which is as I fancy them.
Tho as it said on the Max Factor building below the name —
“Sydney London Paris Rome New York” — & I aspired
in my own way, too.
Funny, all the papers have pointed out
the Auden poem, “1939”, has been much quoted —
& some Yeats? Would Rome or Berlin — Paris even —
have sent minds to poetry? It is the enormity of the act —
New York as symbol — & as never attacked before.
I wonder if it is a new era? You’ll read about it elsewhere —
not here. If it is. I might look up that Schuyler poem, “Funny
the UN building moved / & in all the years / I’ve
lived here” or something — or find the O’Hara one
in which he stays up late trying to select his poems
thinking, good or bad, he did it at least. Wrote them.
Now
I’ve found out what I think. Very little.
As I might have guessed. An event moving ‘under the skin’
away from words — & become attitude.
Events
will be bigger than me. Having ideas about them being
almost irrelevant. Though I ‘have’ them: none helpful or
resolvable: that the New York I liked, even then, came
at a price, that today does, & that I don’t pay it.
The free ride you complain about — would you get off?
As usual the exchange rate dominates the news again
— a cargo cult
The dues you pay are servitude — so you can hate yourself,
or wonder merely at the duration of the ride
Some Thinking
Does all art aspire to the condition
of music? — While someone
is always prepared to say so I put on
a tape, a CD, instead of writing
or put it on to write to.
As far as the art gets.
A tape rolls quietly — “Light Blue”,
“Soul Eyes” — to which I’ve done
a lot of reading, a lot
of pottering about, a few drawings —
& to which I’ve ‘cleaned house’ —
& a lot of writing — or of ‘trying to write’,
which comes to the same thing. Mal Waldron
wrote both these tunes.
I first heard of him
in the poem for Billie Holiday — “The Day
Lady Died”, with the great last lines
where she whispers to him across the keyboard —
“& everyone & I stopped breathing.”
The great thing
about the line is the uncertainty: is it “everyone
& I stopped breathing”? or that Holiday whispers the song
“to Mal Waldron & everyone” — & it is then O’Hara
“stopped breathing”?
It makes for a pause, a hesitation, a number of them —
that evokes the magic & tension
of her timing. And there’s Frank, leaning there
- near the door to the toilets? The ‘john’,
which always suggests the hard American 50s —
& ensures I think of him in a white shirt & narrow tie,
suited. Already the texture of life is disappearing
- exactly how it felt, to be in those suits, in that time, at a nightclub
how anxious or not, how preoccupied & with what —
how people held themselves — is gone. Well,
it survives somehow, unverifiably, hard to quantify,
in poetry ... we still have the music, films —
but films lie. Cassavetes suggests the era to me —
was he ‘the type’ of the hipster — cool, up tight, hip, witty?
suited, a drinker, free, & maybe more exploratory —
within limits more circumscribed than now?
Or do we always see ourselves as more free —
& get it wrong? Did he
& O’Hara meet ever?
Different worlds.
The thing I was going to say about nightclubs
was that maybe how people feel & act in them
never changes. (I heard some magical things
at Lark & Tina’s, for example. I’ve been as tense
as anyone, at the Cargo Club — & wore suits there.)
But night clubs themselves might’ve changed — with the music:
amplified is different? the fashion for recorded
dance music, or for dee-jays, might have altered them.
On tape one of the moments I like best is the voice —
a little shakey, a little spaced — Jim Carroll’s by repute,
asking for tuinols, in the space between songs, at a great
Patti Smith gig. Or Velvet Underground —
they’re both on that tape. There’s some great
& wonderfully casual, relaxed things said, over the music
at a late 50s date that features Miles Davis
guesting with local hero Jimmy Forrest: a type of music, & experience,
continuous with the live recordings of Charlie Parker —
the same carefree ambience & same reason to pay attention
whereas Patti’s music gets to you pretty much
whether you listen or not. You don’t have to choose of course.
“Jesus died for somebody’s sins but not mine”
is always great to hear said. This track,
the badly named “Soul Eyes” (how can you not roll it
into one word?), is not live but so sad & so unhurried
it makes time, development, almost its subject. John
Coltrane. Well within his limits — as
somehow imagined — & great the way conservative paintings
by great artists often are — a Gauguin still-life
that looks as though it wants to be Manet, or Fantin-Latour.
Ken Bolton, 2004
Born in Sydney (1949), Ken Bolton lives in Adelaide, where he is associated with the Experimental Art Foundation and the revived-again Lee Marvin Readings. He is a poet, art critic, and also an editor and publisher — currently producing the Little Esther books series (which have included books by Pam Brown, Laurie Duggan, Cath Kenneally, Cassie Lewis, Gregory O’Brien, Linda Marie Walker and others). He edited the literary magazines Otis Rush and Magic Sam. His major publications include a Selected Poems (Penguin/ ETT) and Untimely Meditations (Wakefield Press). A recent title is August 6th (Little Esther). A newy, At The Flash & At The Baci, is due soon — along with some smaller books, Europe and Three Poems For John Forbes. The Circus (with illustrations by Michael Fitzjames) is due in 2005. His art criticism has been widely published. With Melbourne poet John Jenkins he has also written (and published) a great deal of collaborative poetry — see for example, The Wallah Group (Little Esther) or Nutters Without Fetters (Press Press) or the forthcoming Poems Of Relative Unlikelihood. Ken Bolton edited Homage To John Forbes, published by Brandl & Schlesinger in 2002. He lives with author Cath Kenneally.
it is made available here without charge for personal use only, and it may not be
stored, displayed, published, reproduced, or used for any other purpose
This material is copyright © Ken Bolton and Jacket magazine 2005
The Internet address of this page is
http://jacketmagazine.com/27/bolton-5p.html